Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Neil Pauffley vs Jake Eames Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pauffley vs Eames analysis and find out who is favored!
Neil Pauffley vs Jake Eames Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pauffley 1 - 0 Eames
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pauffley has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eames has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pauffley, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eames has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pauffley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eames has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pauffley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Eames winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pauffley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 87/ 75), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 25/ 31). Eames has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pauffley winning 1 times and Eames being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pauffley winning 2 and Eames winning 1. The last match between Pauffley and Eames was at the Great Britain F11, 05-05-2014, Quarterfinals, Clay with Neil Pauffley getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pauffley and Eames have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pauffley winning 1 times and Eames 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pauffley winning 0, and Eames 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pauffley has played against opponents with an average rank of while Eames has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pauffley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eames has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pauffley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eames has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
406
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
695
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
52% (241-223)
Career Total W/L
44% (45-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Neil Pauffley vs Jake Eames For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Pauffley VS Eames
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Neil Pauffley | Jake Eames |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Neil Pauffley | Jake Eames |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Neil Pauffley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Neil Pauffley
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Daniil Zarichanskyy
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
29%
(
4 of
14)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
26
Total Points Won
7
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Neil Pauffley
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Neil Pauffley
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Neil Pauffley
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Aidan Mchugh
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronan Joncour
Player
Neil Pauffley
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Adam Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Pauffley
Player
Elliott Farmer
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Neil Pauffley
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jake Eames Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Jake Eames
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Scott Puodziunas
Player
Jake Eames
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jake Eames
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jake Eames
Player
Blake Ellis
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Pauffley Vs Eames Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Pauffley are available here and Eames photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
